The Preterm Babies in v-safe Came Earlier
Among v-safe users who wrote about a premature live birth, the share born before 28 weeks was about 1.8 times the pre-pandemic US share
OpenVSafe · 2026-10-29
What the v-safe data shows: our own write-ups, other researchers' work, and published papers.
Among v-safe users who wrote about a premature live birth, the share born before 28 weeks was about 1.8 times the pre-pandemic US share
OpenVSafe · 2026-10-29
A review of the v-safe free-text responses: 3,329 participants who, in their own words, reported serious harm, suicidal thoughts, near-death events, or the death of someone they loved. Free, and in the public domain.
React19 · Brownstone Institute · PDF, 3.7 MB, 1,047 pages
Of 9.9 million v-safe users aged 16 and over, 185,285 (1.87%) reported worse health 3 months or more after vaccination that they put down to the vaccine. Nearly half of them reported being unable to work or do normal activities, a hospital stay, or a severe event.
Retsef Levi, Nelson Lu · Research Square preprint · 25 August 2026
Aravind Mohanoor has done extensive work on v-safe. Two of his v-safe posts:
On the topic of v-safe. Frontier LLMs do not even know what v-safe was designed for!
I have also built a new tool to help with this
Brownstone Institute. How VAERS reports passed the government's “worst case” planning level during the rollout.
His technical reports on aortic aneurysms and dissections in v-safe, newest first:
Nick found 62 aortic dissections reported to v-safe, 60 of them in people's own words, and only 2 of the 62 reached VAERS. He compares them with expected background rates by age and sex, and finds the gap widest in people under 65.
Of the 337 people who described an aortic aneurysm to v-safe in their own words, only 3 had reports that reached VAERS. Includes case studies of the top 10 thoracic cases.
Uses the known background rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms to estimate that v-safe caught at most about 1 in 16 cases, then applies that factor to thoracic aortic aneurysms, which are rare.
Papers from 2022 on that use v-safe data, listed whatever their quality or conclusions. Most are by CDC researchers; the CDC's MMWR reports are listed separately. From PubMed, newest first.
MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) is the CDC's own weekly bulletin. Its reports are reviewed inside the CDC, not peer reviewed by outside experts. Aravind Mohanoor checked these v-safe reports against the v-safe data itself; each one links to his analysis.
All of Aravind's MMWR analyses, with the patterns they share →