OpenVSafe by OpenVAERS
Search V-safe

Analysis

What the v-safe data shows: our own write-ups, other researchers' work, and published papers.

The Preterm Babies in v-safe Came Earlier

Among v-safe users who wrote about a premature live birth, the share born before 28 weeks was about 1.8 times the pre-pandemic US share

OpenVSafe · 2026-10-29

Read the analysis

Cries for Help: Injury and Death Buried in V-Safe Data

A review of the v-safe free-text responses: 3,329 participants who, in their own words, reported serious harm, suicidal thoughts, near-death events, or the death of someone they loved. Free, and in the public domain.

React19 · Brownstone Institute · PDF, 3.7 MB, 1,047 pages

Download PDF Buy Hardcopy ↗ (opens Amazon in a new tab)

Reporting on Prolonged Adverse Health Impact Among V-SAFE Enrollees

Of 9.9 million v-safe users aged 16 and over, 185,285 (1.87%) reported worse health 3 months or more after vaccination that they put down to the vaccine. Nearly half of them reported being unable to work or do normal activities, a hospital stay, or a severe event.

Retsef Levi, Nelson Lu · Research Square preprint · 25 August 2026

Read the preprint ↗

Independent analysis

Aravind Mohanoor

Aravind Mohanoor has done extensive work on v-safe. Two of his v-safe posts:

Leland Lehrman

Nicholas Kottenstette, PhD

His technical reports on aortic aneurysms and dissections in v-safe, newest first:

Peer-reviewed papers

Papers from 2022 on that use v-safe data, listed whatever their quality or conclusions. Most are by CDC researchers; the CDC's MMWR reports are listed separately. From PubMed, newest first.

CDC MMWR reports

MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) is the CDC's own weekly bulletin. Its reports are reviewed inside the CDC, not peer reviewed by outside experts. Aravind Mohanoor checked these v-safe reports against the v-safe data itself; each one links to his analysis.